A complete report of the
results of this research is available in:
Hux, K., Rogers, T., &
Mongar, K. (2000). Common perceptions about strokes. Journal of
Community Health, 25, 47-65.
Abstract
The frequency with which strokes occur
and the devastating effects they can have make provision of general stroke
information an essential element of public health education. This survey
study sought to explore the general public's knowledge about various aspects
of strokes. Results indicated that approximately two-thirds of the survey
respondents could provide correct or partially correct explanations of
stroke physiology and could name at least one stroke warning sign; over
90% could name at least one stroke risk factor and one functional consequence
of stroke. Most respondents reported acquiring information about strokes
through personal acquaintances, popular media, or general life experiences
rather than from professionals or as part of their formal schooling. Some
respondents had misconceptions about physiological processes, risk factors,
warning signs, and functional consequences of strokes.
Purpose
The purpose of this survey study was to
determine the general public's knowledge of:
Method
Participants = 190 adults
Procedure
Survey instrument:
Results
Physiological Processes
of Strokes
Correct free-recall response
Computation of chi-squares revealed that adults with a college education were more likely to provide correct explanations than adults with twelve or fewer years of education (c2 obs.= 7.00; p ? .05).
Risk Factors of Strokes
Figure 2. Percent of respondents who named
various factors as risks to strokes.
Chi-square analyses revealed significant differences in awareness of the risk factor of heredity between people with more versus less than 12 years of education (c2 obs.= 5.34; p ? .05), and among young, middle-aged, and elderly adults (c2 obs.= 6.24; p ? .05). The only other significant difference was that male respondents were more likely than female respondents to name excessive alcohol consumption as a risk factor (c2 obs.= 3.98; p ? .05).
Warning Signs of Strokes
Figure 3. Percent of respondents who named
various factors as stroke warning signs.
The chi-square analyses revealed no significant differences between groups of respondents in the free recall of warning signs.
Functional Consequences of
Strokes
Figure 4. Percent of respondents who named
various functional consequences to strokes.
Chi-square analyses revealed that young, middle-aged, and elderly adults differed in identifying speech impairment as a stroke consequence (c2 obs.= 7.40; p ? .05). Also, those adults acquainted with stroke survivors stated memory loss as a stroke consequence significantly more frequently than respondents who did not know any stroke survivors (c2 obs.= 4.87; p ? .05), but these respondents named brain damage as a consequence significantly less frequently than their peers not acquainted with stroke survivors (c2 obs. = 7.37; p ? .01). Finally, male respondents were significantly more likely than female respondents to name death as a stroke effect (c2 obs.= 9.79; p ? .01).
Sources of Stroke Information
Figure 5. Percent of respondents who obtained
information about strokes from various sources.
Chi-square analyses of information sources revealed three significant differences dealing with respondentsí age groups. One additional significant difference emerged between respondents with different levels of education; those with 12 years of education or less gave responses in the "general life experiences" category more frequently than those with more than 12 years of education.
Discussion
The general population continues to need
education about strokes. All health care providers need to assume responsibility
for educating the general public and need to target the following issues:
University of Nebraska - Lincoln |
UNL TBI Homepage |